Thống kê luật các nước
Thống kê số liệu thực tế các nước
Luật của Poland
Xem toàn văn:
Những điểm chính trong luật
Đấu giá
Article 116, 118a Telecommunications Act (2017): “Article 116. 1. In the absence of sufficient frequency resources, entities to which a general exclusive frequency licence is granted shall be appointed by means of: 1) a contest – in the case of licences for digital broadcasting or re-broadcasting of radio or television programmes; 2) a tender or an auction – in the remaining cases. Article 118a. 1. The criteria for evaluating offers in a tender shall be: 1) maintaining competition; 2) the amount declared by a participant to a tender; 3) other objective criteria than those specified under point 1 and 2, if listed in the documentation. 2. The President of UKE shall select in the documentation the most important criterion of evaluating offers in a tender out of the criteria referred to in paragraph 1 (1) and (2), having regard to regulatory objectives and the level of competition in the market. 2a. The criterion for evaluating offers in an auction shall be the amount declared by a participant to an auction. 3. The criteria for evaluating offers in a contest shall be: 1) maintaining competition; 2) other objective criteria than those specified under point 1, if listed in the documentation. 4. With respect to maintaining competition referred to in paragraph 1 (1) and paragraph 3 (1), the President of UKE shall seek an opinion of the President of UOKiK. 5. The examination of offers in a tender, an auction or a contest shall involve two stages.”
Thi tuyển
Article 116, 118a Telecommunications Act (2017): “Article 116. 1. In the absence of sufficient frequency resources, entities to which a general exclusive frequency licence is granted shall be appointed by means of: 1) a contest – in the case of licences for digital broadcasting or re-broadcasting of radio or television programmes; 2) a tender or an auction – in the remaining cases. Article 118a. 1. The criteria for evaluating offers in a tender shall be: 1) maintaining competition; 2) the amount declared by a participant to a tender; 3) other objective criteria than those specified under point 1 and 2, if listed in the documentation. 2. The President of UKE shall select in the documentation the most important criterion of evaluating offers in a tender out of the criteria referred to in paragraph 1 (1) and (2), having regard to regulatory objectives and the level of competition in the market. 2a. The criterion for evaluating offers in an auction shall be the amount declared by a participant to an auction. 3. The criteria for evaluating offers in a contest shall be: 1) maintaining competition; 2) other objective criteria than those specified under point 1, if listed in the documentation. 4. With respect to maintaining competition referred to in paragraph 1 (1) and paragraph 3 (1), the President of UKE shall seek an opinion of the President of UOKiK. 5. The examination of offers in a tender, an auction or a contest shall involve two stages.”